The GenerIA Blog

AFNOR SPEC 2314: Best Practices in Frugal AI

Blog post illustration
Share this article:

From project design to end-user acculturation, frugal AI is above all a matter of best practices. Numerous and complementary, these BPs are detailed in AFNOR SPEC 2314. Here is a thematic summary.

Note: SPEC 2314 has not been translated into English yet. The translation of the Best Practices titles below is therefore GenerIA's and may differ in the final, official English version of the document.

#1 Continuous Assessment: before, during and after

Before developing an AI system, it is essential to define the organization's real needs, based on a few key questions. What problem does the envisioned AI need to solve? What are the objectives to be achieved? With what technical and energy resources?

A rigorous upstream assessment helps to avoid the development of superfluous solutions, and to focus resources on high value-added projects. Once the AI system has been deployed, it is equally important to put in place mechanisms to measure the effectiveness of the solution, identify areas for improvement and adjust practices accordingly.

This monitoring results from two parallel strategies:

  • Continuous metrology: implement tests to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of models in production.
  • Continuous improvement: adopt an iterative approach to fine-tune models based on feedback.
  • Relevant AFNOR SPEC 2314 best practices:
  • BP 01 - Use needs analysis methods to implement frugality
  • BP 13 - Manage the environmental performance of AI systems
  • BP 23 - Estimate model consumption beforehand
  • BP 25 - Evolve measurement strategies according to issues and constraints to maintain AI service frugality
  • BP 31 - A/B test models to identify the one with the best performance/resource ratio

#2 Data selection and optimization

Data quality determines the success of an AI project. AFNOR recommends giving priority to data sets that have been established as relevant, diverse and representative. It is also important to ensure that the data selected is accessible and usable without requiring excessive resources. In this respect, the use of open data and collaborative sources contributes to a more frugal approach.

To check this mark, two preparatory steps are essential:

  • Targeted data collection: collect only the data required to meet a specific need.
  • Data pre-processing: clean and transform data to maximize quality and relevance.
  • Relevant AFNOR SPEC 2314 best practices:
  • BP 06 - Control data volume
  • BP 07 - Work on data quality
  • BP 08 - Use a relevant dataset to design the AI service
  • BP 10 - Define data storage rules according to use
  • BP 15 - Compress data
  • BP 19 - Use open-source datasets for prototyping

#3 Algorithm selection and optimization

Algorithm optimization is a key step in achieving simple, efficient models that guarantee frugal AI. This optimization involves selecting less resource-intensive algorithms and/or adapting existing algorithms to make them more efficient. It can also include porting certain calculations to languages closer to hardware (C, Rust, etc.).

AFNOR also encourages the use of techniques such as pruning and quantization (adoption of lighter numerical data types), which reduce the size of models while maintaining their performance and increasing their explainability.

Two compasses should therefore be followed:

  • Simplicity: less complex algorithms are easier to interpret and deploy.
  • Transparency: decisions taken by more simple models are more easily explained, thereby boosting user confidence.
  • Relevant AFNOR SPEC 2314 best practices:
  • BP 02 - Select and develop the solution to meet the specific need, considering alternatives to AI
  • BP 03 - Use compression methods to reduce the footprint of AI algorithms
  • BP 04 - Define criteria to justify model retraining
  • BP 26 - Write code that can be improved by several people and re-implemented on several environments
  • BP 27 - Rationalize models
  • BP 28 - Decompose a large AI model into several smaller models
  • BP 29 - Reuse trained algorithms and share them (open-source)
  • BP 30 - Favor more frugal base models

#4 Energy efficiency of infrastructures

AFNOR rightly emphasizes the importance of the choice of computing infrastructures in the energy efficiency of AI models. Indeed, in addition to the electrical specifications of the servers and processors needed for training and production, the energy efficiency (PUE) of datacenters and the specific features of the energy sources that power them (hydroelectricity, nuclear, coal...) are key factors in the environmental impact of AI. Taking them into account right from the design phase can help make deployments more virtuous.

Two main criteria are therefore to be considered:

  • Energy efficiency: favor infrastructures (data centers, hardware, etc.) and algorithms that consume less energy.
  • Sustainability: design the lifecycle of AI projects based on sustainable practices, starting with the choice of electricity source and suppliers.
  • Relevant AFNOR SPEC 2314 best practices:
  • BP 20 - Optimize the use of existing equipment
  • BP 22 - Favor existing user/employee terminals for AI service training or inference
  • BP 24 - Ensure infrastructure frugality throughout operation

#5 Collaboration and sharing of standards, knowledge and measurement tools

Collaboration between the various stakeholders in the sector is essential to promote frugal AI. AFNOR encourages the dissemination and sharing of best practices, tools and resources. Partnerships between client organizations, AI makers and Academia foster innovation and minimize both costs and duplication of effort.

Such a collaboration is based on two inseparable pillars:

  • Knowledge sharing: exchange best practices and lessons learned within the community.
  • Common standards: adopt standards that promote interoperability and compatibility between systems.
  • Relevant AFNOR SPEC 2314 best practices:
  • BP 09 - Integrate frugality into AI relevance criteria
  • BP 12 - Set up a governing body to question and assess frugality
  • BP 16 - Identify & mobilize a pool of frugal AI skills
  • BP 17 - Set up and manage a single repository of frugal AI services
  • BP 18 - Offer off-the-shelf AI digital products that promote frugality
  • BP 21 - Create a repository for the environmental impacts of projects

#6 Ethics and responsibility: awareness-raising and training

For best practices of frugal AI to be adopted, it is essential to raise awareness and train the teams involved in the development and use of the solutions. AFNOR proposes themes for training programs to help professionals understand the challenges of frugal AI and integrate these principles into their daily work.

Among the issues involved, two of them require particular attention:

  • Bias and fairness: biases will exist in data and models and must be minimized if not eliminated.
  • Social impact: assess the social impact of the AI solution under consideration, to ensure that it benefits the greatest number of people, without negative side effects.
  • Relevant AFNOR SPEC 2314 best practices:
  • BP 05 - Implement eco-design measures in the development phase
  • BP 11 - Provide for end-of-life in the management of an AI project
  • BP 14 - Acculturate and train stakeholders

Conclusion

Validation of needs, energy efficiency of infrastructures, optimization of data and algorithms, acculturation of developers and users... the best practices presented in detail in the AFNOR framework promise AI solutions that are at the same time effective, sustainable and ethical. Because they lead us to rethink advanced technologies, could some of them one day become binding regulations?

In the GenerIA blog:

Article Image

Rethinking Your Next Entry-Level Hire: What If AI Took the Repetitive Work?

If your experience with artificial intelligence begins and ends with a free consumer tool, this article may challenge your assumptions. Consumer-grade AI is not the benchmark. Enterprise-grade AI, properly designed and governed, operates at a fundamentally different level and is already reshaping how organizations structure their entry-level work.

Article Image

The Wave Most White-Collar Organizations Do Not See Coming

For years, the dominant narrative around automation was simple: machines would replace manual labor first. Factory floors, warehouses and transportation were expected to absorb the initial shock of AI-driven disruption. But the emerging data tells a different story, one that challenges long-held assumptions about which roles are truly safe. The next major workforce disruption is not aimed at the trades; it is moving steadily toward the office.

Article Image

AI Models and African Languages: Systemic Exclusion and the Case for Sovereign Alternatives

The persistent underrepresentation of African languages in large AI models exposes structural imbalances in data, infrastructure, and design choices - and highlights the urgent need for sovereign, frugal, and explainable alternatives better aligned with local realities.

Article Image

AI Models and Data Exfiltration: The Hidden Risk to Small and Medium Organizations' Competitive Edge

Small and medium organizations are embracing generative AI to move faster and do more with fewer resources. But behind the productivity gains lies a growing, largely invisible threat: sensitive data is quietly leaking into public AI models, undermining competitive advantage. As unmanaged tools become the primary channel for data exfiltration, organizations must rethink how they adopt AI, or risk giving away what makes them unique.

Article Image

Newer, Larger AI Models Are Not Necessarily Better for Your Organization - Arguably, They Can Be Worse

The AI industry remains fixated on scale: more parameters, more data, more compute. Yet beneath the promise of ever-improving performance, structural weaknesses are emerging. Reliability, sustainability, data governance and long-term economic value are increasingly at stake. For most organizations, hyperscale models may represent diminishing returns instead of progress...

Article Image

Shadow AI and Strategic Drift: From Unmanaged Experimentation to Orchestrated Transformation

Generative AI is everywhere inside today's organizations - but rarely where it truly matters. While employees quietly unlock massive productivity gains, most companies fail to translate this momentum into structural advantage. The result: A widening gap between experimentation and strategy, efficiency and transformation.

Article Image

When AI Agents Displace Knowledge Workers: The Case for Structured Workforce Transition

As agentic AI systems cross the threshold from assistance to autonomy, organizations are confronting a structural inflection point. The question is no longer whether knowledge work will change but how deliberately this change will be managed. Without a structured transition strategy, technological acceleration risks outpacing workforce adaptation and turning opportunity into instability.

Article Image

How to Reduce the Environmental Footprint of Municipal AI?

As local authorities accelerate the adoption of AI to modernize public services, one requirement becomes unavoidable: aligning digital performance with ecological responsibility. Reducing the environmental footprint of municipal AI calls for a comprehensive approach based on usage frugality, strong data and infrastructure governance, and continuous impact measurement throughout the service lifecycle.

Article Image

Governing AI in the Public Sector: Policy Frameworks and Best Practices

As artificial intelligence rapidly expands within public administrations, the issue is no longer merely technological but fundamentally institutional. Governing AI means framing its uses, clarifying responsibilities, and ensuring meaningful human oversight in order to reconcile innovation with citizens' rights and democratic trust.

Article Image

No enterprise AIs without Data Lifecycle Management

Managing the lifecycle of the data sources that underpin bespoke enterprise AIs is not optional. Data Lifecycle Management (DLM) is the only way such systems can remain relevant, trustworthy and cost-effective beyond proof-of-concept (POC) experiments.

Article Image

Rethinking Tokenization: How SuperBPE Breaks the Space Barrier

It just took questioning an arbitrary assumption (the Einstein way) to bring tokenization closer to the reality and overcome a years-long limitation in one of the fundamental layers of the NLP stack.

Article Image

From AI Agents To Agentic Systems: Understanding The Paradigm Shift

A shift is underway from predefined, automation-oriented "AI agents" to dynamic, context-sensitive "agentic systems". This evolution goes beyond a simple semantic change. It reflects a transformation in system design, operational logic and adaptive capacity.

Article Image

Mapping AI risks: A Reference Base for Shared Governance

An international academic team proposes a unified directory of more than 700 risks associated with AI, particularly in business environments. This database aims to provide an overview and a common language to technical, regulatory and industrial actors confronted with these complex issues.

Article Image

Regulating Frugal AI: Between Progress and Challenges...

Frugality is a radical shift in the way businesses and governments think about AI. But how do we regulate a technology that promises both performance and a sustainable environmental footprint? Let's take a look at how three major regions - Canada, Europe and the United States - are approaching the problem...

Article Image

Frugal AI: A Gentle Introduction to the AFNOR SPEC 2314 Framework

Fostering innovation without hastening the attrition of natural resources. This is the rationale behind frugal artificial intelligence, whose definition, contours and practices AFNOR intends to normalize.

Article Image

Telemetry, an essential component of the best AIs

Extensive telemetry brings a great deal to enterprise artificial intelligence. Performance, behavior, response biases, prompt injections... Everything that can be observed contributes to continuous optimization, thereby guaranteeing the full success of AI projects.

Article Image

AI and environment (3/3): the systemic risks

Overloaded power grids, the return of fossil fuels, non-recycled electronic waste, skyrocketing social costs... Conventional AI's systemic and societal indicators are all red.

Article Image

AI and environment (2/3): water, critical issue!

Artificial intelligence - at what cost to our water resources? Just like its carbon footprint, Conventional AI's consumption of cooling water is becoming a real ecological threat.

Article Image

AI and environment (1/3): alarming numbers

Insatiable for energy and a major producer of CO2, conventional artificial intelligence looks more and more like an environmental dead end. Is there any hope of sustainability? Everywhere, the numbers suggest otherwise...